Le 17/10/2017 à 16:35, Carlo Arenas a écrit : > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Riku Voipio <riku.voi...@iki.fi> wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:10:04AM -0700, Carlo Arenas wrote: >>> some of the patches already have a Reviewed-by as shown by : >>> >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/818378/ >> >> Can you send the series without the whitespace-only changes? > > sure, but how would you suggest then to do the other changes which are > the overall objective for this? > > * fix any incorrect values (mostly sparc, but there are also in all > other archs incorrect names) > * make sure that the arch specific file mirrors as much as possible > linux headers, so it will be straightforward to update them (even > possible through a script) > * update the arch specific files with latest bits from 4.14 > > should I send those as independent series?, or just as additional > patches in the series, so it is obvious what the dependency is. > > there is also the problem with the enum and related defines which was > custom made and probably copy & pasted around
I think you should re-send your series without changing any indentation and without "[PATCH v2 6/6]". So, I think they'll be applied. Then, if you think the remaining changes are important, you could try to submit a new patch series to do that. Thanks, Laurent
