On 10.11.2017 16:20, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <c...@kaod.org>
> ---
> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> index d682f013d422..a2dcbee07214 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> @@ -3687,6 +3687,20 @@ static const TypeInfo spapr_machine_info = {
> type_init(spapr_machine_register_##suffix)
>
> /*
> + * pseries-2.12
> + */
> +static void spapr_machine_2_12_instance_options(MachineState *machine)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static void spapr_machine_2_12_class_options(MachineClass *mc)
> +{
> + /* Defaults for the latest behaviour inherited from the base class */
> +}
> +
> +DEFINE_SPAPR_MACHINE(2_12, "2.12", true);
By the way, before everybody now introduces "2.12" machine types ... is
there already a consensus that the next version will be "2.12" ?
A couple of months ago, we discussed that we could maybe do a 3.0 after
2.11, e.g. here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-03/msg05056.html
I'd still like to see that happen... Peter, any thoughts on this?
Thomas
