On 29.11.2017 16:59, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:54:30 +0100
> David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>>> diff --git a/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c b/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c
>>>> index 31e3f3f415..39da9aeef4 100644
>>>> --- a/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c
>>>> +++ b/target/s390x/mmu_helper.c
>>>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>>>  #include "internal.h"
>>>>  #include "kvm_s390x.h"
>>>>  #include "sysemu/kvm.h"
>>>> +#include "exec/exec-all.h"
>>>>  #include "trace.h"
>>>>  #include "hw/s390x/storage-keys.h"
>>>>  
>>>> @@ -458,7 +459,7 @@ static int translate_pages(S390CPU *cpu, vaddr addr, 
>>>> int nr_pages,
>>>>          }
>>>>          if (!address_space_access_valid(&address_space_memory, pages[i],
>>>>                                          TARGET_PAGE_SIZE, is_write)) {
>>>> -            program_interrupt(env, PGM_ADDRESSING, ILEN_AUTO);
>>>> +            trigger_pgm_exception(env, PGM_ADDRESSING, ILEN_AUTO);  
>>>
>>> Why did you change this?  
>>
>> "For TCG, there was one case where a cpu loop exit was triggered. Fix
>> that up."
>>
>> Wasn't worth a separate patch :)
> 
> Well, maybe it is, to avoid dumb questions :)

... splitting it up :) Thanks!

-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Reply via email to