Hi Halil,
On 2017/12/11 21:54, Halil Pasic wrote:
>
>
> On 12/11/2017 01:56 PM, Longpeng (Mike) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2017/12/6 19:01, Halil Pasic wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/06/2017 08:37 AM, Longpeng(Mike) wrote:
>>>> +\field{outcome_len} is the size of struct virtio_crypto_session_input or
>>>> +ZERO for the session-destroy operation.
>>>
>>> This ain't correct. It should have been something like
>>> virtio_crypto_destroy_session_input.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Halil,
>>
>> I already fixed this just now.
>> Do you have any other comments on v22 ? I'll send v23 tomorrow if no. :)
>>
>
> Did not read the rest of the document. I'm not in the middle of something,
> but I wanted to read the operation part these days. I guess, you prefer
> sending out v23 over waiting, so I guess I will wait for v23 then.
>
Sorry, I prefer to wait for more comments on v22.
> Some general questions/remarks before you spin v23:
>
> * I'm not convinced about this 'header' and 'extra parameters' terminology.
> Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Header_(computing) for header.
> I don't think it's fitting for the _flf structs.
> Same about the 'extra'. Please see
> https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/extra
> (a : more than is due, usual, or necessary : additional) the things in
> _vlf aren't extra at all. Do you intend to stick with is terminology?
> If yes why? Please explain how should I read/understand it so that it makes
> sense!
>
I use 'fixed-length paramenters' instead of 'header' and 'variable-length
parameters' instead of 'extra parameters' in certain places, but other places
are forgotten.
BTW, I think this isn't a big problem and structural defect, I hope native
speakers could help us.
> * Do we want/need to specify any alignment requirement for the
> stuff in guest storage (for instance the _flf fields) or be explicit
> about no alignment should be assumed (e.g
> virtio_crypto_mac_create_session_flf.algo
> ain't necessarily aligned (in guest memory) as required by uint32_t)?
>
The _flf fields are all 32bit or 64bit.
> * I assume one request is supposed to correspond to one descriptor chain.
> Right? If yes, could you tell me, where is this expressed in the spec.
>
> Halil
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscr...@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-h...@lists.oasis-open.org
>
>
> .
>
--
Regards,
Longpeng(Mike)
