On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 03:31:08PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 9 January 2018 at 04:11, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > So it's an existing bug exposed by the test. > > I've reverted the test for now but I didn't rebase > > as there are downstream trees based on this pull req. > > Hi -- I'm afraid this seems to have conflicts with the sparc > pullreq. I tried the simple textual merge resolution for > hw/pci-host/apb.c, but that then fails to compile. > Can you fix up and resend, please? > > thanks > -- PMM
Pushed what I think is the fix. Testing it, but I saw some changes in submodules and I screwed them up in the past - could you pls help check and make sure I didn't do anything wrong?