On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 03:31:08PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 9 January 2018 at 04:11, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > So it's an existing bug exposed by the test.
> > I've reverted the test for now but I didn't rebase
> > as there are downstream trees based on this pull req.
> 
> Hi -- I'm afraid this seems to have conflicts with the sparc
> pullreq. I tried the simple textual merge resolution for
> hw/pci-host/apb.c, but that then fails to compile.
> Can you fix up and resend, please?
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM

Pushed what I think is the fix. Testing it, but I saw
some changes in submodules and I screwed them up in
the past - could you pls help check and make sure
I didn't do anything wrong?

Reply via email to