On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 08:10:23PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 09:14:41AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 21 December 2017 at 23:43, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >> you also need to drop "hw/pci: remove obsolete PCIDevice->init()"
> > >> (applied in your tree as 18951fce55d5aa58cd1629b4cb704ee51bab4420)
> > >> else the not-yet-QOM'ified NVME won't work anymore.
> > >
> > > Done that too, thanks a lot
> > 
> > Hi. I'm afraid this pullreq (merge of 880b1ff) has new runtime
> > errors from the clang sanitizer:
> > 
> > /home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-for-merges/hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c:201:27:
> > runtime error: member access within misaligned address 0x55b4ffee8246
> > for type 'struct ip_header', which requires 4 byte alignment
> > 0x55b4ffee8246: note: pointer points here
> >  01 00 00 00 45 00  01 a9 01 00 00 00 40 11  78 45 00 00 00 00 ff ff
> > ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00
> >              ^
> > /home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-for-merges/hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c:201:27:
> > runtime error: load of misaligned address 0x55b4ffee8246 for type
> > 'uint8_t' (aka 'unsigned char'), which requires 4 byte alignment
> > 0x55b4ffee8246: note: pointer points here
> >  01 00 00 00 45 00  01 a9 01 00 00 00 40 11  78 45 00 00 00 00 ff ff
> > ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00
> >              ^
> > /home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-for-merges/hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c:208:65:
> > runtime error: member access within misaligned address 0x55b4ffee8246
> > for type 'struct ip_header', which requires 4 byte alignment
> > 0x55b4ffee8246: note: pointer points here
> >  01 00 00 00 45 00  01 a9 01 00 00 00 40 11  78 45 00 00 00 00 ff ff
> > ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00
> >              ^
> > /home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-for-merges/hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c:210:13:
> > runtime error: member access within misaligned address 0x55b4ffee8246
> > for type 'struct ip_header', which requires 4 byte alignment
> > 0x55b4ffee8246: note: pointer points here
> >  01 00 00 00 45 00  01 a9 01 00 00 00 40 11  78 45 00 00 00 00 ff ff
> > ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00
> >              ^
> > /home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-for-merges/hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c:210:13:
> > runtime error: load of misaligned address 0x55b4ffee8246 for type
> > 'uint8_t' (aka 'unsigned char'), which requires 4 byte alignment
> > 0x55b4ffee8246: note: pointer points here
> >  01 00 00 00 45 00  01 a9 01 00 00 00 40 11  78 45 00 00 00 00 ff ff
> > ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00
> >              ^
> > 
> > Sorry for the late report, I didn't quite have time
> > to process the pull before Christmas holidays.
> > 
> > thanks
> > -- PMM
> 
> So I bisected and the reason is this commit:
> 
> commit 18b20bb43a2f37f0c8ae23a3e9b3d9a4a05b6bd4
> Author: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> Date:   Tue Dec 19 15:45:22 2017 +1100
> 
>     tests/pxe-test: Add some extra tests
>     
>     Previously virtio-net was only tested for ppc64 in "slow" mode.  That
>     doesn't make much sense since virtio-net is used much more often in
>     practice than the spapr-vlan device which was tested always.  So, move
>     virtio-net to always be tested on ppc64.
>     
>     We had no tests at all for the q35 machine, which doesn't seem wise
>     given its increasing prominence.  Add a couple of tests for it,
>     including testing the newer e1000e adapter.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
>     Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
>     Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
> 
> :040000 040000 5a982bfea24b9ac3c651b84425a39b3c85f4871e 
> 771af3fdfb2778c6d6ed6b1098d1e79c181d6fb0 M      tests
> 
> Pls either fix or drop e1000e test

Feel free to drop this patch for now.  I'll debug and repost it when I
have a chance.

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to