On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 09:40:52AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >>diff --git a/hw/piix4.c b/hw/piix4.c
> >>index 5489386..1678898 100644
> >>--- a/hw/piix4.c
> >>+++ b/hw/piix4.c
> >>@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ static PCIDeviceInfo piix4_info[] = {
> >> .qdev.desc = "ISA bridge",
> >> .qdev.size = sizeof(PCIDevice),
> >> .qdev.no_user = 1,
> >>+ .qdev.no_hotplug = 1,
> >> .init = piix4_initfn,
> >> },{
> >> /* end of list */
> >
> >This one breaks the build for me. The below seems to help - but begs
> >the question: was this tested?
>
> Tested on x86. piix4 chipset is used by hw/mips_malta.c, looks like
> I forgot to do a testbuild with all targets enabled :-(
Let's just patch whatever was tested for now?
> >diff --git a/hw/piix4.c b/hw/piix4.c
> >index 1678898..00da049 100644
> >--- a/hw/piix4.c
> >+++ b/hw/piix4.c
> >@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static PCIDeviceInfo piix4_info[] = {
> > .qdev.desc = "ISA bridge",
> > .qdev.size = sizeof(PCIDevice),
> > .qdev.no_user = 1,
> >- .qdev.no_hotplug = 1,
> >+ .no_hotplug = 1,
> > .init = piix4_initfn,
> > },{
> > /* end of list */
>
> This is correct. Do you just squash in the fix or do you want me
> respin the patch series?
>
> cheers,
> Gerd
Could you split the tested and untested parts to separate patches,
noting the status in the commit message?
We could then queue the tested parts directly and wait for
maintainer's ack for the rest.
--
MST
