On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 03:03:07PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 16 February 2018 at 14:53, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 16/02/2018 12:25, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> On 16 February 2018 at 11:18, Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> The block folks are already doing this, so we should just > >> formalize what they're doing at the moment I guess. From my point > >> of view as long as there's something I can easily filter > >> in/out in the email body or subject so I don't get confused > >> (and which doesn't require me to update my filters every time > >> a new subsystem switches to using submaintainer pulls!) > >> I don't mind about the rest of it. Maybe a subject line with > >> 'PULL SUBSYSTEM s390x' (ditto block, etc etc) ? > > > > What about just requiring you to be in the "To" or "Cc" fields? That > > works pretty well for Linux. > > It would require existing submaintainers to change their process, > though -- currently not all pull requests are to/cc me.
All this time I thought it was /already/ required to cc Peter on pull requests ! Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|