On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 06:13:06PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 01/03/2018 09:44, Peter Xu wrote:
> > + * qio_channel_add_watch_source:
> > + * @ioc: the channel object
> > + * @condition: the I/O condition to monitor
> > + * @func: callback to invoke when the source becomes ready
> > + * @user_data: opaque data to pass to @func
> > + * @notify: callback to free @user_data
> > + * @context: gcontext to bind the source to
> > + *
> > + * Similar as qio_channel_add_watch(), but allows to specify context
> > + * to run the watch source, meanwhile return the GSource object
> > + * instead of tag ID, with the GSource referenced already.
> > + *
> > + * Note: callers is responsible to unref the source when not needed.
> > + *
> > + * Returns: the source pointer
> > + */
> > +GSource *qio_channel_add_watch_source(QIOChannel *ioc,
> > + GIOCondition condition,
> > + QIOChannelFunc func,
> > + gpointer user_data,
> > + GDestroyNotify notify,
> > + GMainContext *context);
> >
>
> Just a small thing, this is a bit inconsistent with the rest of the
> GSource API, where the g_source_attach is usually left to the caller
> when a function returns GSource *.
>
> You might therefore name it instead qio_channel_create_watch, for
> consistency with g_io_{add,create}_watch, and remove the "context" argument.
Looks like there is already a qio_channel_create_watch() (io/channel.c).
How about qio_channel_create_watch_attached()? Or... anything better?
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
