"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilb...@redhat.com> wrote: > * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote: >> It will be used to store the uri parameters. We want this only for >> tcp, so we don't set it for other uris. We need it to know what port >> is migration running. >> >> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> >> >> -- >> >> This used to be uri parameter, but it has so many troubles to >> reproduce that it don't just make sense. >> >> This used to be a port parameter. I was asked to move to >> SocketAddress, done. >> I also merged the setting of the migration tcp port in this one >> because now I need to free the address, and this makes it easier. >> This used to be x-socket-address with a single direction, now it is a >> list of addresses. > > Is there a reason it's a parameter rather than just an entry in > MigrationInfo?
Done. I think that we *should* create a migration instance also on destination side, it is so much different adding things one side than the other. Later, Juan.
