On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com
> wrote:

> * Eric Blake (ebl...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > On 06/27/2018 03:41 PM, Zhang Chen wrote:
> > > From: Zhang Chen <chen.zh...@intel.com>
> > >
> > > Suggested by Markus Armbruster rename COLO unknown mode to none mode.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <chen.zh...@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >   migration/colo-failover.c |  2 +-
> > >   migration/colo.c          |  2 +-
> > >   qapi/migration.json       | 10 +++++-----
> > >   3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > >   # Since: 2.8
> > >   ##
> > >   { 'enum': 'COLOMode',
> > > -  'data': [ 'unknown', 'primary', 'secondary'] }
> > > +  'data': [ 'none', 'primary', 'secondary'] }
> >
> > The deletion of 'unknown' could potentially be a user-visible regression
> > visible if COLOMode were in a QMP command; but thankfully the generated
> > qapi/qapi-introspect.c does not seem to cover this enum, so it just
> affects
> > internal code for now.
>
> Note that the migration capability to enable colo is still x-colo;
> so I take that to mean we've still got a free hand to change any part of
> the COLO interface until we're happy it's right.
>
> Dave
>
>
Thanks Eric and Dave.

Zhang Chen



> > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
> >
> > --
> > Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
> > Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
> > Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org
> --
> Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
>

Reply via email to