Hi, > I realize you pasted a prototype patch below (thanks for that!), but it > doesn't update the documentation. I wouldn't like to dig down another > design rabbit hole here. > > If you can pursue upstreaming this change, I can definitely delay my > series, and use the enhanced pci testdev as a reproducer.
Patch sent. > But, I'm not explicitly asking you to pursue it -- none of this > classifies as a "serious bug", so these patches might not be the best > uses of our times. Well, jumping through loops to get the tests going with ivshmem + memory overcommit isn't that a great use of our times either ... cheers, Gerd
