The line immediate following a ".. code::" block is considered
to contains arguments to the "code directive".  The lack of a
new line gives me during at parse time:

   testing.rst:63: (ERROR/3) Error in "code" directive:
   maximum 1 argument(s) allowed, 3 supplied.

   .. code::
     make check-unit V=1

   testing.rst:120: (ERROR/3) Error in "code" directive:
   maximum 1 argument(s) allowed, 3 supplied.

   .. code::
     make check-qtest V=1

Let's add the missing newlines, both for consistency and to
avoid the parsing errors.

Signed-off-by: Cleber Rosa <cr...@redhat.com>
---
 docs/devel/testing.rst | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/docs/devel/testing.rst b/docs/devel/testing.rst
index 727c4019b5..9355ad49f2 100644
--- a/docs/devel/testing.rst
+++ b/docs/devel/testing.rst
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ variable (which affects memory reclamation and catches 
invalid pointers better)
 and gtester options. If necessary, you can run
 
 .. code::
+
   make check-unit V=1
 
 and copy the actual command line which executes the unit test, then run
@@ -118,6 +119,7 @@ and using gdb on the test is still simple to do: find out 
the actual command
 from the output of
 
 .. code::
+
   make check-qtest V=1
 
 which you can run manually.
-- 
2.17.1


Reply via email to