On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 21:48:34 -0400, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > - 70/40% use rate for growing/shrinking the TLB does not > seem a great choice, if one wants to avoid a pathological > case that can induce constant resizing. Imagine we got > exactly 70% use rate, and all TLB misses were compulsory > (i.e. a direct-mapped TLB would have not prevented a ^^^ > single miss). We'd then double the TLB size:
I meant fully associative. E.