Fei Li <f...@suse.com> writes: > On 10/11/2018 09:19 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Fei Li <f...@suse.com> writes: >> >>> The caller of qemu_init_vcpu() already passed the **errp to handle >> Which caller? There are many. Or do you mean "The callers"? > Oh, sorry, I mean "The callers" :) >> >>> errors. In view of this, add a new Error parameter to the following >>> call trace to propagate the error and let the further caller check it. >> Which "call trace"? > Actually, I want to say all functions called by qemu_init_vcpu().. >> >>> Besides, make qemu_init_vcpu() return a Boolean value to let its >>> callers know whether it succeeds. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Fei Li <f...@suse.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com> >>> --- >>> accel/tcg/user-exec-stub.c | 2 +- >>> cpus.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- >>> include/qom/cpu.h | 2 +- >>> target/alpha/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> target/arm/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> target/cris/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> target/hppa/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> target/i386/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> target/lm32/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> target/m68k/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> target/microblaze/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> target/mips/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> target/moxie/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> target/nios2/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> target/openrisc/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> target/ppc/translate_init.inc.c | 4 +++- >>> target/riscv/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> target/s390x/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> target/sh4/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> target/sparc/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> target/tilegx/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> target/tricore/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> target/unicore32/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> target/xtensa/cpu.c | 4 +++- >>> 24 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/accel/tcg/user-exec-stub.c b/accel/tcg/user-exec-stub.c >>> index a32b4496af..38f6b928d4 100644 >>> --- a/accel/tcg/user-exec-stub.c >>> +++ b/accel/tcg/user-exec-stub.c >>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ void cpu_resume(CPUState *cpu) >>> { >>> } >>> -void qemu_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu) >>> +bool qemu_init_vcpu(CPUState *cpu, Error **errp) >>> { >> You need to return a value here. Sure you compile-tested this? > Oops! I forget the TCG case.. The `return true` should be added. > Thanks for pointing this out!
You're welcome. >>> } >>> diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c [...] >> I see how you changed the code to pass an Error from the >> qemu_FOO_start_vcpu() through qemu_init_vcpu() to its callers. I can't >> see how such errors can be created. Without a way to create any, the >> patch is pointless. What am I missing? > This patch is also the pre-patch for the updated qemu_thread_create() > in patch 7/7 > just as I explained in patch 2/7 [Issue1]. Patches that make little sense on their own, but pave the way for a later patch are okay. But they should explain that purpose in their commit message.