On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 06:14:26PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 19/11/18 16:31, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > I've tried to give suggestions how to restructure series > > on per patch basis. In my opinion it quite possible to split > > series in several smaller ones and it should really help with > > making series cleaner and easier/faster to review/amend/merge > > vs what we have in v5. > > This is true, on the other hand the series makes sense together and, > even if the patches are more or less independent, they also all follow > the same "plan". For reviewing v6, are you aware of Patchew's series > diff functionality? It can tell you which patches had comments in v5, > reorder patches if applicable, and display deleted and new patches at > the right point in the series. > > v4->v5 is a bit messed up because Samuel probably added a diff order > setup > (https://patchew.org/QEMU/20181101102303.16439-1-sa...@linux.intel.com/diff/20181105014047.26447-1-sa...@linux.intel.com/) > but it's very useful in general. > > Paolo
Oh I didn't realize difforder breaks patchew. Or is the problem only if one switches from no order to difforder? -- MST
