On 21/12/18 15:04, Robert Hoo wrote: >> So this series is correct and I will follow up with one for INTEL_PT; >> however, this begs the question of how the patches are being tested. > > My apologies for carelessness.
No problem. In the future please check that "-cpu Icelake-Client" doesn't have warnings such as qemu-system-x86_64: warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.07H:EBX.intel-pt [bit 25] when run on an Icelake-Client host. > I've seen you patch for INTEL_PT. So am I going to resend these 2 > patches and Cc qemu-stable? or simply reply these 2 patches adding > qemu-stable in Cc list? I can take care of that, thanks. Paolo
