On 2/27/19 8:18 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 27.02.19 14:14, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> No reasons for not reporting found corruptions as corruptions in case
>> of some internal errors, especially in case of just failed to fix l2
>> entry (and in this case, missed corruptions may influence comparing
>> logic, when we calculate difference between corruptions fields of two
>> results)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com>
>> ---
>>  block/qcow2-refcount.c | 19 +++++++++----------
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com>
> 
> I'll be on PTO for a couple of weeks, so it doesn't make sense for me to
> take this series to my branch now, though...
> 
> Max
> 

Should we have staged this somewhere else? Is it non-applicable for
4.0.0-rc1?

I suppose these are not "fixes."

--js

Reply via email to