On 30/04/2019 07.49, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 4/29/19 2:33 AM, driver1998 wrote:
>> Windows ARM64 uses LLP64 model, which breaks current assumptions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: driver1998 <driver1...@foxmail.com>
>> ---
>>  util/cacheinfo.c | 4 +++-
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/util/cacheinfo.c b/util/cacheinfo.c
>> index 3cd080b83d..a815cb0722 100644
>> --- a/util/cacheinfo.c
>> +++ b/util/cacheinfo.c
>> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static void sys_cache_info(int *isize, int *dsize)
>>  static void arch_cache_info(int *isize, int *dsize)
>>  {
>>      if (*isize == 0 || *dsize == 0) {
>> -        unsigned long ctr;
>> +        uintptr_t ctr;
>>  
>>          /* The real cache geometry is in CCSIDR_EL1/CLIDR_EL1/CSSELR_EL1,
>>             but (at least under Linux) these are marked protected by the
>> @@ -120,6 +120,8 @@ static void arch_cache_info(int *isize, int *dsize)
>>          if (*dsize == 0) {
>>              *dsize = 4 << ((ctr >> 16) & 0xf);
>>          }
>> +
>> +        printf("%d %d\n", *isize, *dsize);
> 
> The patch looks correct (except your real name), but here you forgot to
> remove this debugging code.

Right. With the "Signed-off-by" line you have to state that you've read
and followed the "Developer's Certificate of Origin". For this, no
pseudonym contributions are possible, sorry.
See this URLs for details:

 
https://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch#Patch_emails_must_include_a_Signed-off-by:_line

  Thomas

Reply via email to