On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 09:00:56 +0200 David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 30.04.19 07:41, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > > > > On 29.04.19 21:24, David Hildenbrand wrote: > >> Just wondering, why keep the PCKMO ones separate, but not e.g. PCC ? > > > > Because those can be disabled at the HMC. It is painful to disable 5 > > elements > > for LPARs that are configured that way. So I created a group for those. That > > will allow to disable the full group. > > (we have the same issue with the exisiting AES and DEA pckmo functions). > > Rings a bell, maybe that information would be good to have in the cover > letter. I guess Conny might want to change the description when picking up: > > "Provide the MSA9 facility (stfle.155). This also contains pckmo > subfunctions for key wrapping. Keep them in a separate group to disable > those as a block if necessary. This is for example needed when disabling > key wrapping via the HMC." Sure, makes sense to fold that in.
