On 30/04/2019 20.13, Cao Jiaxi wrote:
> Windows ARM64 uses LLP64 model, which breaks current assumptions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cao Jiaxi <driver1...@foxmail.com>
> ---
> util/cacheinfo.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/util/cacheinfo.c b/util/cacheinfo.c
> index 3cd080b83d..ce6f0dbf6a 100644
> --- a/util/cacheinfo.c
> +++ b/util/cacheinfo.c
> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static void sys_cache_info(int *isize, int *dsize)
> static void arch_cache_info(int *isize, int *dsize)
> {
> if (*isize == 0 || *dsize == 0) {
> - unsigned long ctr;
> + uintptr_t ctr;
Looking at the whole function, is uintptr_t really the right type to use
here? ctr does not seem to contain the value of a pointer variable, so
this looks wrong to me...
Do you get a compiler warning here? If so, how does it look like?
Anyway, I think it would be better to use a uint64_t or uint32_t type
here instead if possible?
Thomas
