On 5/2/19 7:09 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> 128-bit handling courtesy of Richard H.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
> ---
> target/s390x/insn-data.def | 2 +
> target/s390x/translate_vx.inc.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
> +static void gen_acc(TCGv_i64 d, TCGv_i64 a, TCGv_i64 b, uint8_t es)
> +{
> + const uint8_t msb_bit_nr = NUM_VEC_ELEMENT_BITS(es) - 1;
> + TCGv_i64 msb_mask = tcg_const_i64(dup_const(es, 1ull << msb_bit_nr));
> + TCGv_i64 t1 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> + TCGv_i64 t2 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> + TCGv_i64 t3 = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> +
> + /* Calculate the carry into the MSB, ignoring the old MSBs */
> + tcg_gen_andc_i64(t1, a, msb_mask);
> + tcg_gen_andc_i64(t2, b, msb_mask);
> + tcg_gen_add_i64(t1, t1, t2);
> + /* Calculate the MSB without any carry into it */
> + tcg_gen_xor_i64(t3, a, b);
> + /* Calculate the carry out of the MSB in the MSB bit position */
> + tcg_gen_and_i64(d, a, b);
> + tcg_gen_and_i64(t1, t1, t3);
> + tcg_gen_or_i64(d, d, t1);
> + /* Isolate and shift the carry into position */
> + tcg_gen_and_i64(d, d, msb_mask);
> + tcg_gen_shri_i64(d, d, msb_bit_nr);
> +
> + tcg_temp_free_i64(t1);
> + tcg_temp_free_i64(t2);
> + tcg_temp_free_i64(t3);
> +}
...> +static void gen_acc32_i64(TCGv_i64 d, TCGv_i64 a, TCGv_i64 b)
> +{
> + gen_acc(d, a, b, ES_32);
> +}
> +
> +static void gen_acc_i64(TCGv_i64 d, TCGv_i64 a, TCGv_i64 b)
> +{
> + TCGv_i64 t = tcg_temp_new_i64();
> +
> + tcg_gen_add_i64(t, a, b);
> + tcg_gen_setcond_i64(TCG_COND_LTU, d, t, b);
> + tcg_temp_free_i64(t);
> +}
As an aside, I think the 32-bit version should use 32-bit ops, as per
gen_acc_i64. That would be 4 * 2 operations instead of 2 * 9 over the 128-bit
vector.
r~
