On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 08:21 -0500, Michael Roth wrote:
> >> + switch (level& G_LOG_LEVEL_MASK) {
> >> + case G_LOG_LEVEL_ERROR: return "error";
> >> + case G_LOG_LEVEL_CRITICAL: return "critical";
> >> + case G_LOG_LEVEL_WARNING: return "warning";
> >> + case G_LOG_LEVEL_MESSAGE: return "message";
> >> + case G_LOG_LEVEL_INFO: return "info";
> >> + case G_LOG_LEVEL_DEBUG: return "debug";
> >> + default: return "user";
> >> + }
> >
> > Urgh!
> >
> > No two statements on the same line please!
Always wondered what the logic for this one is. IMHO the above is FAR
neater than splitting it to near double its height.
What kind of coding error does splitting this out aim to prevent?
missing break; / return; statements? Because I dont see how it achieves
that...
