On 7/3/19 7:00 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 02/07/2019 19.43, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 29/06/2019 14.26, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> On 6/28/19 8:15 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> [...]
>>>> +static uint32_t mmio_readb(NeXTState *s, hwaddr addr)
>>>> +{
>>>> + switch (addr) {
>>>> + case 0xc000:
>>>> + return (s->scr1 >> 24) & 0xFF;
>>>> + case 0xc001:
>>>> + return (s->scr1 >> 16) & 0xFF;
>>>> + case 0xc002:
>>>> + return (s->scr1 >> 8) & 0xFF;
>>>> + case 0xc003:
>>>> + return (s->scr1 >> 0) & 0xFF;
>>>
>>> So you have a 32-bit implementation (DMA accessed device?).
>>>
>>> memory::access_with_adjusted_size() already does this work
>>> for you if you use:
>>>
>>> .impl.min_access_size = 4,
>>> .valid.min_access_size = 1,
>>> .valid.max_access_size = 4,
>>
>> Yeah, it's old code from 2011 ... I'll try to rework it as you suggested.
>
> That does not really seem to work. I'm then still seeing accesses to
> 0xc002 in my "readl" handler. Looks like access_with_adjusted_size() is
> not really ready for that yet (see the FIXME in that function - it does
> not take care of unaligned accesses yet).
I was convinced the unaligned series [*] was already merged. Anyway you
give me a good news, we have new a test for it :)
[*] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-06/msg06957.html
