30.07.2019 21:41, John Snow wrote: > > > On 7/30/19 12:32 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> Here are two small fixes. >> >> 01 is not a degradation at all, so it's OK for 4.2 >> 02 is degradation of 3.0, so it's possibly OK for 4.2 too, >> but it seems to be real bug and fix is very simple, so, >> may be 4.1 is better >> >> Or you may take the whole series to 4.1 if you want. >> > > I think (1) and (2) can go in for stable after review, but they're not > crucial for 4.1 especially at this late of a stage. Should be cataclysms > only right now. > > --js >
I can rebase it than on your bitmaps branch. Or, if we want it for stable, maybe, I shouldn't? -- Best regards, Vladimir
