On 7/31/19 6:29 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 30.07.2019 21:41, John Snow wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7/30/19 12:32 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> Here are two small fixes.
>>>
>>> 01 is not a degradation at all, so it's OK for 4.2
>>> 02 is degradation of 3.0, so it's possibly OK for 4.2 too,
>>> but it seems to be real bug and fix is very simple, so,
>>> may be 4.1 is better
>>>
>>> Or you may take the whole series to 4.1 if you want.
>>>
>>
>> I think (1) and (2) can go in for stable after review, but they're not
>> crucial for 4.1 especially at this late of a stage. Should be cataclysms
>> only right now.
>>
>> --js
>>
>
> I can rebase it than on your bitmaps branch. Or, if we want it for stable,
> maybe,
> I shouldn't?
>
Good point. Keep it based on main and I'll slip it in at the beginning
of the staging queue.
--js
