Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> writes:

> Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 02:05:36PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> hw/boards.h pulls in almost 60 headers.  The less we include it into
>>> headers, the better.  As a first step, drop superfluous inclusions,
>>> and downgrade some more to what's actually needed.  Gets rid of just
>>> one inclusion into a header.
>>> 
>>> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelb...@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> The following files use the MACHINE macro and require
>> hw/boards.h, but are touched by this patch:
>>
>> hw/acpi/cpu.c:    MachineState *machine = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>> hw/acpi/memory_hotplug.c:    MachineState *machine = 
>> MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>> hw/i386/intel_iommu.c:    MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>> hw/i386/x86-iommu.c:    MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>> hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c:    MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>> hw/s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm.c:    MachineState *machine = 
>> MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>> hw/s390x/s390-stattrib-kvm.c:    MachineState *machine = 
>> MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
>
> Since they still compile, they obviously still get it indirectly.  I'll
> drop these hunks.
>
>> Maybe there are other files touched by this patch that require
>> struct MachineClass or struct MachineState contents to be
>> defined, but this is a bit trickier to verify.
>
> I tried to exclude those, but I might have screwed it up, just like I
> screwed up for MACHINE().  I'll double-check.

None contain matches for /\bMachine(Class|State) *[^ *]/.

Reply via email to