On 22/08/19 13:04, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 11:50, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> wrote: >> One-off tasks: >> >> 1. Create CI runners that offer similar cross-architecture coverage to >> Peter's current setup. qemu.org has some x86, ppc, and s390 server >> resources available. I'm not sure about ARM and other architectures. > > Quick list of what I currently have: > * freebsd/openbsd/netbsd -- these are just running the tests/vm stuff > * an x86-64 machine doing the w32/w64 crossbuilds > * aarch64 > * aarch32 (done via chroot on an aarch64 box) > * osx
I was thinking of setting up a Macincloud account with a Patchew runner for this. > * ppc64 (on a gcc compile farm machine) > * s390 (on a machine Christian arranged for project use) Great, we could also move the Patchew tester off the Fedora machine that is getting a bit crowded. David, any chance you could add Docker support to ppc64 builds? I don't feel too comfortable doing untrusted builds inside the RH network without any protection from containers etc. > Of those the s390 is OK for project use. I'm not sure the gcc > compile farm stuff is recommended for fully automatic CI, so > if we can avoid that it would be better. Linaro can probably > provide some arm-server resources but I haven't checked/asked yet. Same as above for Docker support. If ARM builds can be containerized, I can also look for resources inside Red Hat. Paolo
