* Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote: > On 22/08/19 18:31, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > >> With both these points in mind, I think it is pretty hard sell to > >> say we should write & maintain a custom CI system just for QEMU > >> unless it is offering major compelling functionality we can't do > >> without.
(That was Dan's comment) > In theory I agree. > > In practice, the major compelling functionality is portability. If it > is true that setting up runners is problematic even on aarch64, frankly > GitLab CI is dead on arrival. If it is not true, then I'd be very happy > to use GitLab CI too. IMHO if for some weird reason Gitlab has problems on aarch64 then we just need to get that fixed. Dave > Paolo > > > I'd agree; and I'd also find it useful to have runners setup for > > Gitlab CI for related things (it would be useful for the virtio-fs > > stuff); if there are problems on other architectures then we should > > find some go wranglers to go fix it. -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
