On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:28:23AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > Hi David, > > On 9/16/19 2:42 AM, David Gibson wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 11:19:34PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > >> Quick tests worth to avoid regressions with the 40p machine. > >> idea from the "Maintainers, please tell us how to boot your machines" > >> thread: > >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-03/msg04177.html > >> > >> v2: Split Travis job, added Hervé R-b tag > >> v1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-06/msg05896.html > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Phil. > > > > I'm guessing you're expecting these to go in via the testing tree, in > > which case > > > > Acked-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> > > Thanks, appreciated :) > > > Or do you want me to take them via the ppc tree? > > I think the 'testing tree' should focus on the CI/testing > infrastructure, while each subsystem maintainers should care about the > tests covering their subsystem (the testing tree maintainers might not > have the required knowledge to be sure a test is correctly implemented). > > In this particular case I assume you don't have much knowledge of that > PPC machine, which is a hobbyist one, but since you are the PPC > maintainer, I'd rather see this going via your tree :) > > Alex/Cleber/Eduardo, any comment on this position?
This makes sense to me. We don't need all new tests to go through the same tree. -- Eduardo