On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 12:19:52PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:56:06AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > On 9/16/19 11:52 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: > > > > > > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> writes: > > > > > >> Hi David, > > >> > > >> On 9/16/19 2:42 AM, David Gibson wrote: > > >>> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 11:19:34PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > >>>> Quick tests worth to avoid regressions with the 40p machine. > > >>>> idea from the "Maintainers, please tell us how to boot your machines" > > >>>> thread: > > >>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-03/msg04177.html > > >>>> > > >>>> v2: Split Travis job, added Hervé R-b tag > > >>>> v1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-06/msg05896.html > > >>>> > > >>>> Regards, > > >>>> > > >>>> Phil. > > >>> > > >>> I'm guessing you're expecting these to go in via the testing tree, in > > >>> which case > > >>> > > >>> Acked-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> > > >> > > >> Thanks, appreciated :) > > >> > > >>> Or do you want me to take them via the ppc tree? > > >> > > >> I think the 'testing tree' should focus on the CI/testing > > >> infrastructure, while each subsystem maintainers should care about the > > >> tests covering their subsystem (the testing tree maintainers might not > > >> have the required knowledge to be sure a test is correctly implemented). > > >> > > >> In this particular case I assume you don't have much knowledge of that > > >> PPC machine, which is a hobbyist one, but since you are the PPC > > >> maintainer, I'd rather see this going via your tree :) > > >> > > >> Alex/Cleber/Eduardo, any comment on this position? > > > > > > Once we have a .travis.yml I'm happy with it can go in via another tree > > > no problem. See other thread.... > > > > Good :) > > > > David can take patches 1-5 (I tagged patch 6 as RFC but messed something > > with git-publish and lost it when I sent this series). > > Ok, I've taken patches 1-5 into my ppc-for-4.2 tree.
Hrm. Judging by both the continued comments on this thread, and the fact it breaks the travis build, seems like this series needs a little more work. I've pulled it out of ppc-for-4.2 again, and I'll wait for the next spin. > > > > > Thanks! > > > > >>>> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (6): > > >>>> tests/acceptance: Add test that runs NetBSD 4.0 installer on PRep/40p > > >>>> tests/acceptance: Test Open Firmware on the PReP/40p > > >>>> tests/acceptance: Test OpenBIOS on the PReP/40p > > >>>> tests/acceptance: Test Sandalfoot initrd on the PReP/40p > > >>>> .travis.yml: Let the avocado job run the 40p tests > > >>>> .travis.yml: Split enterprise vs. hobbyist acceptance test job > > >>>> > > >>>> .travis.yml | 18 +++- > > >>>> MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > >>>> tests/acceptance/ppc_prep_40p.py | 150 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > >>>> 3 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > >>>> create mode 100644 tests/acceptance/ppc_prep_40p.py > > >>>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > > -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature