On 9/27/19 11:17 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 27.09.19 11:14, Janosch Frank wrote: >> On 9/27/19 10:51 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> On 26.09.19 13:33, Claudio Imbrenda wrote: >>>> From: Janosch Frank <fran...@linux.ibm.com> >>>> >>>> * All sclp codes need to be checked for page boundary violations. >>>> * Requests over 4k are not a spec exception. >>>> * Invalid command checking has to be done before the boundary check. >>> >>> Can we split this patch up so we fix one thing at a time? >> >> Sure, but we would end up with very small patches. >> Do you want that? > > Why should I say no to easy-to-review, logically consistent, small > chunks? I have shortcuts for my RB's and ACK's, so I don't have to type > much ;) >
Higher patch count for me, win - win :-)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
