On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 01:49:12PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> We have been trying to avoid adding new aliases for CPU model
> versions, but in the case of changes in defaults introduced by
> the TAA mitigation patches, the aliases might help avoid user
> confusion when applying host software updates.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kcham...@redhat.com>
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-11/msg03501.html
- - -
Should we (can do it, if you already don't have a patch WIP for it)
also update this file to reflect this?
https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=blob;f=docs/qemu-cpu-models.texi
While at it ... I wonder if it's worth making a separte doc
(versioned-cpu-models.rst) explaining the versioned CPU models, usage,
etc.
There was a very useful discussion between you and Dan Berrangé on this
list (Message-Id: <20190625050008.12789-5-ehabk...@redhat.com>, the
first version of the thread: "[PATCH 4/6] i386: Infrastructure for
versioned CPU models"). Could potentially incorporate some of that
content.
> ---
> target/i386/cpu.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
[...]
--
/kashyap
