On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:12:45PM +0100, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 01:49:12PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > We have been trying to avoid adding new aliases for CPU model > > versions, but in the case of changes in defaults introduced by > > the TAA mitigation patches, the aliases might help avoid user > > confusion when applying host software updates. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> > > Tested-by: Kashyap Chamarthy <kcham...@redhat.com> > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-11/msg03501.html
Thanks! > > - - - > > Should we (can do it, if you already don't have a patch WIP for it) > also update this file to reflect this? > https://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=blob;f=docs/qemu-cpu-models.texi Yes, we should. Thanks for the reminder! > > While at it ... I wonder if it's worth making a separte doc > (versioned-cpu-models.rst) explaining the versioned CPU models, usage, > etc. > > There was a very useful discussion between you and Dan Berrangé on this > list (Message-Id: <20190625050008.12789-5-ehabk...@redhat.com>, the > first version of the thread: "[PATCH 4/6] i386: Infrastructure for > versioned CPU models"). Could potentially incorporate some of that > content. > We should, but I don't think I can do it in time for QEMU 4.2. > > --- > > target/i386/cpu.c | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > [...] > > -- > /kashyap -- Eduardo
