On Saturday, November 30, 2019, Michael Rolnik <mrol...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Aleksandar.
>
> thanks for pointing that out I was not aware of that.
> I can fix it.
>

That'd be great!

Thanks,
Aleksandar



>
> Regards,
> Michael Rolnik
>
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 6:29 PM Aleksandar Markovic <
> aleksandar.m.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, November 30, 2019, Aleksandar Markovic <
>> aleksandar.m.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, November 27, 2019, Michael Rolnik <mrol...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + *  Performs the logical AND between the contents of register Rd and
>>>> register
>>>> + *  Rr and places the result in the destination register Rd.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static bool trans_AND(DisasContext *ctx, arg_AND *a)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    TCGv Rd = cpu_r[a->rd];
>>>> +    TCGv Rr = cpu_r[a->rr];
>>>> +    TCGv R = tcg_temp_new_i32();
>>>> +
>>>> +    /* op */
>>>> +    tcg_gen_and_tl(R, Rd, Rr); /* Rd = Rd and Rr */
>>>> +
>>>> +    /* Vf */
>>>> +    tcg_gen_movi_tl(cpu_Vf, 0); /* Vf = 0 */
>>>> +
>>>> +    /* Zf */
>>>> +    tcg_gen_setcondi_tl(TCG_COND_EQ, cpu_Zf, R, 0); /* Zf = R == 0 */
>>>> +
>>>> +    gen_ZNSf(R);
>>>> +
>>>> +    /* R */
>>>> +    tcg_gen_mov_tl(Rd, R);
>>>> +
>>>> +    tcg_temp_free_i32(R);
>>>> +
>>>> +    return true;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +
>>>>
>>>
>>> According to specs:
>>>
>>> http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/devicedoc/atmel-42505-8-bit-avr-
>>> microcontrollers-attiny102-attiny104_datasheet.pdf
>>>
>>> ... the chips in question have cores with 16 GPRs (that correspond to
>>> GPRs R16-R31 of more common AVR cores with 32 GPRs).
>>>
>>>
>> There are more examples;
>>
>> http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/atmel-8127-avr-8-bit-
>> microcontroller-attiny4-attiny5-attiny9-attiny10_datasheet.pdf
>>
>> Also ATtiny20, ATtiny40.
>>
>> How do you handle such cores?
>>>
>>> I don't see here anything preventing usage of all 32 GPRs, resulting, of
>>> course, in an inaccurate emulation.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Aleksandar
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Michael Rolnik
>

Reply via email to