On Fri 31 Jan 2020 06:44:22 PM CET, Eric Blake wrote: > As the feature name table can be quite large (over 9k if all 64 bits > of all three feature fields have names; a mere 8 features leaves only > 8 bytes for a backing file name in a 512-byte cluster), it is unwise > to emit this optional header in images with small cluster sizes. > > Update iotest 036 to skip running on small cluster sizes; meanwhile, > note that iotest 061 never passed on alternative cluster sizes > (however, I limited this patch to tests with output affected by adding > feature names, rather than auditing for other tests that are not > robust to alternative cluster sizes). > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <be...@igalia.com> Berto
