On 2011-06-23 13:14, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > 2011/6/23 Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@web.de>: >> On 2011-06-23 11:18, Wayne Xia wrote: >>> Hi, >>> these 3 patch simply enable qemu-kvm to show a logo picture when it >> >> You are posting on qemu-devel (which is correct for this topic), so your >> patches must target that tree. Patch 1 eg. does not and needs rebasing. > > More specifically, develop code against qemu.git as a default. Much > of the development that goes into qemu-kvm actually comes via > qemu.git. If you need to do qemu-kvm.git specific stuff, you'll know. > > Additional info: > "The QEMU codebase is known as qemu.git. That's the git repository > that holds the QEMU source code history. The KVM codebase is known as > qemu-kvm.git, the git repository that holds the KVM source code > history. > > The relationship between qemu.git and qemu-kvm.git is as follows. > qemu-kvm.git is a fork of qemu.git and periodically merges updates > from qemu.git back into qemu-kvm.git. A lot of code changes are merged > into qemu.git and become available in qemu-kvm.git after the next > periodic merge. KVM-specific enhancements may be merged into > qemu-kvm.git and may be sent back upstream to qemu.git. > > Efforts are underway to completely merge qemu-kvm.git into qemu.git. > This will make qemu-kvm.git obsolete and result in a single codebase. > In the future there may only be a qemu package." > > http://blog.vmsplice.net/2011/03/should-i-use-qemu-or-kvm.html
BTW, do we have such information in the linux-kvm.org and maybe also qemu.org wikis? If not, I guess it would help, in some cases at least. Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
