On 02/28/20 12:47, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 02/28/20 05:04, Andrew Fish wrote:
>> Given the above it seems like the 2 options are: >> 1) Pad OVMF_CODE.fd to be very large so there is room to grow. > > There's already room to grow, *inside* OVMF_CODE.fd. As I've shown > elsewhere in this thread, even the 2MB build has approx. 457 KB free in > the DXEFV volume, even without link-time optimization and without > DEBUG/ASSERT stripping, if you don't enable additional features. Typo; I meant FVMAIN_COMPACT, not DXEFV. Laszlo
