On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 13:46:50 +0200 Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > > I'd rather try the MONITOR_CMD_ASYNC thing then the cond variable, it's > > becoming pretty > > ugly. Also I guess what Daniel described is possible, but it changes the > > usage of screendump > > even more. Is turning do_screen_dump to async viable? I think I'll work on > > it. > > Daniel's suggestion is a nice option which goes on top ;) Some months ago it was suggested that we returned the screenshot as a base64 string. But this might have issues if the screenshot is/becomes too large, as we're imposing some limits on the json token size (I think it's 64MB today). Daniel's idea seems to be a good one though. > > The filename-based screendump has to continue working for backward > compatibility reasons. > > cheers, > Gerd >
