On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:33:26AM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:29:16 +0300 > Alon Levy <al...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:41:48PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > > On 07/13/11 11:29, Alon Levy wrote: > > > >On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:10:19AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > > >>On 07/12/11 15:55, Alon Levy wrote: > > > >>>Later the save will happen asynchronously on surface_updated callback. > > > >> > > > >>Hmm. I can see why you are doing that. It makes the file being > > > >>written *after* the monitor command finishes though, which I think > > > >>we should avoid. > > > > > > > >I think the simplest thing would be to add a specific cond for this - > > > >ppm_save_filename_cond. ok? > > > > > > Not sure. Luiz, do we have async monitor commands meanwhile? > > > > > > Background: screendump for qxl vga can take a while as the > > > spice-server might have to render everything first ... > > > > I'd rather try the MONITOR_CMD_ASYNC thing then the cond variable, it's > > becoming pretty > > ugly. > > IIRC, that interface doesn't work as expected and is going to be replaced > by the QAPI's one.
In what way is in wrong? it seems to work fine here - monitor is blocked until I call the callback, after which it returns. Didn't test the qmp part though. > > > Also I guess what Daniel described is possible, but it changes the usage of > > screendump > > even more. Is turning do_screen_dump to async viable? I think I'll work on > > it. > > > > > > > > cheers, > > > Gerd > > > > > >