On 25/05/20 07:50, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > >> On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 06:04, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> These devices are optional, and enabled by property "enable-bitband". >>> armv7m_instance_init() creates them unconditionally, because the >>> property has not been set then. armv7m_realize() realizes them only >>> when the property is true. Works, although it leaves unrealized >>> devices hanging around in the QOM composition tree. Affects machines >>> microbit, mps2-an505, mps2-an521, musca-a, and musca-b1. >>> >>> Bury the unwanted devices by making armv7m_realize() unparent them. >>> Visible in "info qom-tree"; here's the change for microbit: >> >> What does "bury" mean here? To me it implies "they still >> exist but we've stuck them in a hole somewhere and covered >> them up", but the qom-tree delta suggests we've actually >> really deleted them? > > We really delete them now. > > "They've been lying dead in the streets; give them a decent burial". > > Would you like me to s/Bury/Delete/?
"Bury unwanted" -> "Dispose of unused"? Paolo
