On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 13:32, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 25/05/20 07:50, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > > > >> On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 06:04, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>> These devices are optional, and enabled by property "enable-bitband". > >>> armv7m_instance_init() creates them unconditionally, because the > >>> property has not been set then. armv7m_realize() realizes them only > >>> when the property is true. Works, although it leaves unrealized > >>> devices hanging around in the QOM composition tree. Affects machines > >>> microbit, mps2-an505, mps2-an521, musca-a, and musca-b1. > >>> > >>> Bury the unwanted devices by making armv7m_realize() unparent them. > >>> Visible in "info qom-tree"; here's the change for microbit: > >> > >> What does "bury" mean here? To me it implies "they still > >> exist but we've stuck them in a hole somewhere and covered > >> them up", but the qom-tree delta suggests we've actually > >> really deleted them? > > > > We really delete them now. > > > > "They've been lying dead in the streets; give them a decent burial". > > > > Would you like me to s/Bury/Delete/? > > "Bury unwanted" -> "Dispose of unused"?
Yeah, delete or dispose of would be clearer I think. thanks -- PMM