On 5/20/20 12:34 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 05/19/20 20:20, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> The 'blob_id' argument refers to a QOM object able to produce >> data consumable by the fw_cfg device. The producer object must >> implement the FW_CFG_DATA_GENERATOR interface. > > OK, this answers my OBJECT_CHECK() question under patch #1 (in the > negative -- an assert would be wrong). > >> >> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> >> --- >> softmmu/vl.c | 17 +++++++++++++---- >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/softmmu/vl.c b/softmmu/vl.c >> index ae5451bc23..f76c53ad2e 100644 >> --- a/softmmu/vl.c >> +++ b/softmmu/vl.c >> @@ -489,6 +489,10 @@ static QemuOptsList qemu_fw_cfg_opts = { >> .name = "string", >> .type = QEMU_OPT_STRING, >> .help = "Sets content of the blob to be inserted from a string", >> + }, { >> + .name = "blob_id", >> + .type = QEMU_OPT_STRING, >> + .help = "Sets id of the object generating fw_cfg blob to be >> used", >> }, >> { /* end of list */ } >> }, >> @@ -2020,7 +2024,7 @@ static int parse_fw_cfg(void *opaque, QemuOpts *opts, >> Error **errp) >> { >> gchar *buf; >> size_t size; >> - const char *name, *file, *str; >> + const char *name, *file, *str, *blob_id; >> FWCfgState *fw_cfg = (FWCfgState *) opaque; >> >> if (fw_cfg == NULL) { >> @@ -2030,14 +2034,17 @@ static int parse_fw_cfg(void *opaque, QemuOpts >> *opts, Error **errp) >> name = qemu_opt_get(opts, "name"); >> file = qemu_opt_get(opts, "file"); >> str = qemu_opt_get(opts, "string"); >> + blob_id = qemu_opt_get(opts, "blob_id"); >> >> /* we need name and either a file or the content string */ > > (1) Please update this comment. If the option is given, we need the > name, and exactly one of: file, content string, blob_id. > >> - if (!(nonempty_str(name) && (nonempty_str(file) || nonempty_str(str)))) >> { >> + if (!(nonempty_str(name) >> + && (nonempty_str(file) || nonempty_str(str) || >> nonempty_str(blob_id))) >> + ) { >> error_setg(errp, "invalid argument(s)"); >> return -1; >> } > > (2) Coding style: does QEMU keep operators on the left or on the right > when breaking subconditions to new lines? (I vaguely recall "to the > right", but I could be wrong... Well, "hw/nvram/fw_cfg.c" has at least 7 > examples of the operator being on the right.)
You are right, I have been confused with a recommendation from Eric Blake, but it was about shell script, not C. > >> - if (nonempty_str(file) && nonempty_str(str)) { >> - error_setg(errp, "file and string are mutually exclusive"); >> + if (nonempty_str(file) && nonempty_str(str) && nonempty_str(blob_id)) { >> + error_setg(errp, "file, string and blob_id are mutually exclusive"); >> return -1; >> } > > (3) I believe this catches only when all three of name/string/blob_id > are given. But we should continue catching "two given". > > How about reworking both "if"s, *and* the comment at (1) at the same > time, into: > > if (!nonempty_str(name) || > nonempty_str(file) + nonempty_str(str) + nonempty_str(blob_id) != 1) { > error_setg(errp, "name, plus exactly one of file, string and blob_id, > " > "are needed"); > return -1; > } > > (Regarding the addition, nonempty_str() returns a "bool", which is a > macro to _Bool, which is promoted to "int" or "unsigned int".) > >> if (strlen(name) > FW_CFG_MAX_FILE_PATH - 1) { >> @@ -2052,6 +2059,8 @@ static int parse_fw_cfg(void *opaque, QemuOpts *opts, >> Error **errp) >> if (nonempty_str(str)) { >> size = strlen(str); /* NUL terminator NOT included in fw_cfg blob */ >> buf = g_memdup(str, size); >> + } else if (nonempty_str(blob_id)) { >> + return fw_cfg_add_from_generator(fw_cfg, name, blob_id, errp); >> } else { >> GError *err = NULL; >> if (!g_file_get_contents(file, &buf, &size, &err)) { >> > > (4) The "-fw_cfg" command line option is documented in both the qemu(1) > manual, and the "docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt" file. > > I think we may have to update those. In particular I mean *where* the > option is documented (in both texts). Oh I forgot this part, thanks. > > In the manual, "-fw_cfg" is currently under "Debug/Expert options", but > that will no longer apply (I think?) after this series. Well I'm not sure, the intent is the same, targeting mostly libvirt as management interface; other uses are for "experts". > > Similarly, in "docs/specs/fw_cfg.txt", the section is called "Externally > Provided Items" -- but that might not be strictly true any more either. > > Maybe leave the current "-fw_cfg" mentions in peace, and document > "-fw_cfg blob_id=..." separately (in different docs sections)? The > "fw_cfg generators" concept could deserve dedicated sections. > > Sorry that I can't make a good concrete suggestion. :( Thanks for the detailed review! > > Thanks, > Laszlo >