On 9/18/20 4:38 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 01:43:07PM -0500, Babu Moger wrote:
>> apic_id contains all the information required to build
>> CPUID_8000_001E. core_id and node_id is already part of
>> apic_id generated by x86_topo_ids_from_apicid.
>>
>> Also remove the restriction on number bits on core_id and
>> node_id.
>>
>> Remove all the hardcoded values and replace with generalized
>> fields.
>>
>> Refer the Processor Programming Reference (PPR) documentation
>> available from the bugzilla Link below.
>>
>> Link:
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.kernel.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D206537&data=02%7C01%7Cbabu.moger%40amd.com%7C3d768d58412043311f8208d85c1b2432%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637360619193685138&sdata=NEWhmXx4QbtPv9XVFOqw1i3AbSm74qjC%2FqZXU9E0BJ0%3D&reserved=0
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.mo...@amd.com>
>> ---
> [...]
>> @@ -6019,7 +5914,7 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index,
>> uint32_t count,
>> break;
>> case 0x8000001E:
>> assert(cpu->core_id <= 255);
>
> I assume we still want to remove this assert()? Do you plan to
> redo and resubmit
Sure. I will resubmit it.
