> -----Original Message----- > From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [mailto:phi...@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 10:05 PM > To: ganqixin <ganqi...@huawei.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; > qemu-triv...@nongnu.org; Marc-André Lureau > <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>; th...@redhat.com > Cc: Chenqun (kuhn) <kuhn.chen...@huawei.com>; Zhanghailiang > <zhang.zhanghaili...@huawei.com>; Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>; > Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] u2f-passthru: put it into the 'usb' category > > On 11/15/20 7:48 PM, Gan Qixin wrote: > > The category of the u2f-passthru device is not set, put it into the 'usb' > > category. > > I guess we discussed this with Thomas 1 or 2 years ago but I don't remember. > I think it was about using set_bits() so devices can appear in multiple > categories. > > Gerd, do you know what is the point of the "usb" category for management > apps? This is a bus accepting multiple better categorized devices (display, > storage, input, network, sound). > > Unrelated but multiple devices are related to SECURITY. > Maybe it is time to introduce the DEVICE_CATEGORY_SECURITY?
Hi, Philippe Thanks for your reply, but I'm not sure if it is appropriate to add a security category to place this device. (Maybe it's because I don't know much about these device, I haven't find many safety-related devices in 'misc' category or uncategorized devices) Thanks, Gan Qixin
