On 11/17/20 2:37 PM, ganqixin wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [mailto:phi...@redhat.com] >> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2020 10:05 PM >> To: ganqixin <ganqi...@huawei.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; >> qemu-triv...@nongnu.org; Marc-André Lureau >> <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>; th...@redhat.com >> Cc: Chenqun (kuhn) <kuhn.chen...@huawei.com>; Zhanghailiang >> <zhang.zhanghaili...@huawei.com>; Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>; >> Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] u2f-passthru: put it into the 'usb' category >> >> On 11/15/20 7:48 PM, Gan Qixin wrote: >>> The category of the u2f-passthru device is not set, put it into the 'usb' >>> category. >> >> I guess we discussed this with Thomas 1 or 2 years ago but I don't remember. >> I think it was about using set_bits() so devices can appear in multiple >> categories. >> >> Gerd, do you know what is the point of the "usb" category for management >> apps? This is a bus accepting multiple better categorized devices (display, >> storage, input, network, sound). >> >> Unrelated but multiple devices are related to SECURITY. >> Maybe it is time to introduce the DEVICE_CATEGORY_SECURITY? > > Hi, Philippe > Thanks for your reply, but I'm not sure if it is appropriate to add a > security category to place this device. > (Maybe it's because I don't know much about these device, I haven't find many > safety-related devices in 'misc' category or uncategorized devices)
What is the difference between 'misc' and 'uncategorized'? > > Thanks, > Gan Qixin >
