On 12/17/20 12:44 AM, Bin Meng wrote: > What happens if something like ARM big.LITTLE needs to be supported on RISC-V?
I'd say it's the board's job to pass the boot heart. (Though even big.LITTLE doesn't mix 64 and 32-bit cores.) r~
- [PATCH v4 13/16] target/riscv: cpu_helper: Remove compil... Alistair Francis
- [PATCH v4 04/16] riscv: virt: Remove target macro condit... Alistair Francis
- [PATCH v4 14/16] target/riscv: csr: Remove compile time ... Alistair Francis
- [PATCH v4 06/16] hw/riscv: virt: Remove compile time XLE... Alistair Francis
- [PATCH v4 09/16] target/riscv: fpu_helper: Match functio... Alistair Francis
- [PATCH v4 16/16] hw/riscv: Use the CPU to determine if 3... Alistair Francis
- Re: [PATCH v4 16/16] hw/riscv: Use the CPU to deter... Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH v4 16/16] hw/riscv: Use the CPU to deter... Bin Meng
- Re: [PATCH v4 16/16] hw/riscv: Use the CPU to d... Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH v4 16/16] hw/riscv: Use the CPU ... Palmer Dabbelt
- Re: [PATCH v4 16/16] hw/riscv: Use the ... Alistair Francis
- [PATCH v4 12/16] target/riscv: cpu: Remove compile time ... Alistair Francis
- [PATCH v4 15/16] target/riscv: cpu: Set XLEN independent... Alistair Francis
