On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 09:18, Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 12:43:21PM +0000, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > The vhost-user-blk server test was already in Michael Tsirkin's recent vhost > > pull request, but was dropped because it exposed vhost-user regressions > > (b7c1bd9d7848 and the Based-on tag below). Now that the vhost-user > > regressions > > are fixed we can re-introduce the test case. > > > > This series adds missing input validation that led to a Coverity report. The > > virtio-blk read, write, discard, and write zeroes commands need to check > > sector/byte ranges and other inputs. This solves the issue Peter Maydell > > raised > > in "[PATCH for-5.2] block/export/vhost-user-blk-server.c: Avoid potential > > integer overflow". > > > > Merging just the input validation patches would be possible too, but I > > prefer > > to merge the corresponding tests so the code is exercised by the CI. > > > Peter reports this hanging for him so I dropped this for now. > Pls work with him to resolve, and resubmit. > If possible let's defer the addition of new tests and just fix existing > ones for 5.2.
Ping! This series was trying to fix a Coverity error -- it got dropped for 5.2 but now 6.0 is open what are the plans for it? thanks -- PMM