On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 02:17:21PM +1200, Kai Huang wrote: > On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 14:24 +0800, Yang Zhong wrote: > > From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopher...@intel.com> > > > > KVM_CAP_SGX_ATTRIBUTE is a proposed capability for Intel SGX that can be > > used by userspace to enable privileged attributes, e.g. access to the > > PROVISIONKEY. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopher...@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zh...@intel.com> > > --- > > linux-headers/linux/kvm.h | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h > > index 020b62a619..0961b03007 100644 > > --- a/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h > > +++ b/linux-headers/linux/kvm.h > > @@ -1056,6 +1056,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_resize_hpt { > > #define KVM_CAP_ENFORCE_PV_FEATURE_CPUID 190 > > #define KVM_CAP_SYS_HYPERV_CPUID 191 > > #define KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING 192 > > +#define KVM_CAP_SGX_ATTRIBUTE 195 > > > > > > This hasn't been updated to 196. > As for KVM_CAP_SGX_ATTRIBUTE is still 195, i mentioned this in the coverletter, and this release still rebased on KVM-SGX upstream branch(5.12.0-rc3+). Since the KVM-SGX series has been merged into linux release in 5/1, i will rebase Qemu SGX on linux release in the next version patch series.
> > Btw, should we just copy the latest kvm.h from linux kernel? 193-195 are > missing if only > define KVM_CAP_SGX_ATTRIBUTE here. There are three macro definitions before KVM_CAP_SGX_ATTRIBUTE, and KVM_CAP_X86_BUS_LOCK_EXIT use case is being upstreamed by our colleague. As for other two macro definitions, i am not sure if we need add those here. thanks! Yang