On 12/05/2021 15:57, Bruno Piazera Larsen wrote:
On 12/05/2021 15:33, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 5/12/21 9:08 AM, Bruno Larsen (billionai) wrote:
diff --git a/include/exec/helper-proto.h b/include/exec/helper-proto.h
index ba100793a7..ce287222ee 100644
--- a/include/exec/helper-proto.h
+++ b/include/exec/helper-proto.h
@@ -38,7 +38,9 @@ dh_ctype(ret) HELPER(name) (dh_ctype(t1), dh_ctype(t2), dh_ctype(t3), \
  #define IN_HELPER_PROTO
    #include "helper.h"
+#ifdef CONFIG_TCG
  #include "trace/generated-helpers.h"
+#endif
  #include "accel/tcg/tcg-runtime.h"
  #include "accel/tcg/plugin-helpers.h"

Um.. this file is exclusively TCG already.
Are you missing some use of helper_foo()?
A lot of files that we are compiling (mainly mmu-*, excp_helper and gdbstub IIRC). We could comb through all of them and remove all declarations of helpers and wrap the inclusion of helper-proto itself in ifdefs, but it felt unnecessarily long. If it is preferable, we can do it.

So, I just looked and we'd need to change excp_helper.c and mmu-hash64.c, encasing 14 and 8 helper_foo() declarations. Is it better to work on those 2 files, or to change helper-proto?
--
Bruno Piazera Larsen
Instituto de Pesquisas ELDORADO <https://www.eldorado.org.br/?utm_campaign=assinatura_de_e-mail&utm_medium=email&utm_source=RD+Station>
Departamento Computação Embarcada
Analista de Software Trainee
Aviso Legal - Disclaimer <https://www.eldorado.org.br/disclaimer.html>

Reply via email to